Most workplace scores tell you how your organisation is doing. A benchmark tells you how your organisation is doing compared to others. The two things are not the same and conflating them is one of the most common mistakes leaders make when they start measuring how people feel about working for them.
Why a number on its own is hard to interpret
If your score is 72, is that good? Without context, it is almost impossible to say. Is it high for your sector? Low for your size? Typical for this time of year? A score without a reference point is useful for tracking movement over time, but it cannot tell you where you stand relative to your peers.
This is the problem a benchmark solves. It gives your score a frame of reference - not by comparing you to every organisation in the country, but by comparing you to organisations doing similar work, in similar conditions, asking the same question.
Why the question has to be the same for the benchmark to mean anything
Benchmarking only works when the question is consistent. If one organisation asks employees how they feel about their pay and another asks how they feel about their manager, and a third asks how they feel about working there generally, the resulting scores are not comparable. They are measuring different things.
This is why the same single question is used across every organisation that participates - how people feel about working at their company, asked the same way, to the same scale, every time. The consistency of the question is what makes the benchmark defensible. It means when you see where your score sits relative to your sector, you are comparing the same thing across every entry.
How the benchmark is structured
The benchmark works across three dimensions:
-
Sector - accounting, law, insurance, real estate, financial services and other desk-based businesses. Your score is compared with organisations operating in the same industry.
-
Size - businesses with 50 to 100 employees and larger corporations. Comparing organisations of a similar size makes the benchmark more useful.
- Region - where relevant, the benchmark narrows further to give local context alongside the national sector picture.
Every organisation that participates contributes anonymously to the benchmark average for their cohort. Individual scores are never published. The rankings only celebrate the top performers publicly - there is no league table of the worst, no public comparison of who sits at the bottom. Every entrant sees their own position privately and can act on it. Only the top tier is recognised externally.
What it means when you can see where you stand
When an organisation can see that its score sits in the top quartile for its sector, that is meaningful information for recruitment, retention and leadership decisions. When a score is below the sector average, that is equally useful - it identifies a gap worth closing before it becomes a problem.
The benchmark is most powerful when measurement is continuous rather than annual. A score taken once a year shows you a snapshot. A score that updates with each check-in, measured against a sector benchmark, shows you a trend - and trends are what give leaders enough time to act before the situation changes.
The takeaway
A benchmark only means something when every organisation in the comparison is measuring the same thing the same way. Sector-specific benchmarking gives your score context - not just how you are doing, but how you are doing compared to organisations like yours. The organisations that benefit most are the ones measuring continuously, because they can see movement in that context over time, not just a single point in a calendar year.
Ready to see where your organisation stands? Book a demo
First 90 days free. No card required. No commitment. Cancel anytime..
Related: Why your score means more when you can compare it
